Judging from my last two posts...
... I was right.
We are not allowed to post anything political here at How Does One Deal, since we tend to think while leaning to the right.
After all, Right is Wrong in the Gay-Blogisphere. Post a fake picture of some cutie from Hollywood? Comments. Fake picture of the residents of Sesame Street having gay sex? Comments.
What a crock. I think I'd rather eat an Oreo Cookie.
We are not allowed to post anything political here at How Does One Deal, since we tend to think while leaning to the right.
After all, Right is Wrong in the Gay-Blogisphere. Post a fake picture of some cutie from Hollywood? Comments. Fake picture of the residents of Sesame Street having gay sex? Comments.
What a crock. I think I'd rather eat an Oreo Cookie.
Labels: Politics
posted by Mike at 10/02/2006 08:32:00 PM
8 Comments:
I couldn't care less which way you lean - I'm a lot more conservative than most of "them" like, but whatever.
The reason I didn't comment is because I couldn't make sense of the post.
I don't comment with your political posts because I almost always disagree with you, and I don't want to be rude. It is your blog after all.
Sorry, chris, but if you couldn't make sense of the post(s), you didn't follow the links.
murch112: it is perfectly okay to disagree, that is how conversations begin. If I didn't comment on every blog post (at other blogs) I disagree with, I might not ever comment.
Hell, I could be completely wrong in that last thought. Maybe that's what the posters WISH would happen.
You're right; when someone has links to links inside links in links in pages in links with little explaination of what they're talking about, then no, I don't follow them.
Just sayin'
I'm okay with that, chris. I'd suggest picking up a paper, watching the news, following the links, or continue not commenting.
Just sayin'
In that case, when you take on the responsibility to make decisions for the public, you loose the right to make these kind of bad decisions for yourself. I am not saying that it doesn't happen (all the time) but for christ's sake lay off the teenagers. I can think of few things less reprehensible than sexual overtures towards children. One final thought, if he gave up too easily and without a fight, what else (and worse) must he be hiding?
Hehe, yep. That's why I didn't comment in the first place, goober, until you said nobody did.
In fact I read a great deal of news, but without following all your links, I didn't know to what exactly you were referring to, so just didn't say anything.
I mean, I don't ONLY read you for the porn. :)
See? I even read back to see if you respond to old comments!
(PS beta blogger still sucks for the rest of us trying to leave you comments.)
word ver: zzqqhssam
Chris: you - kill - me.
Murph: Please. He is not a "child". He was a paige at 16, the perported "emails" were after his tenure (read:17) and once again, there was NO TOUCHING!!
It is still "icky" and he should have resigned.
And making bad decisions is the American way. You never lose that right.
My word ver: vualckb
Post a Comment
<< Home