Monday, October 02, 2006

Judging from my last two posts...

... I was right.

We are not allowed to post anything political here at How Does One Deal, since we tend to think while leaning to the right.

After all, Right is Wrong in the Gay-Blogisphere. Post a fake picture of some cutie from Hollywood? Comments. Fake picture of the residents of Sesame Street having gay sex? Comments.

What a crock. I think I'd rather eat an Oreo Cookie.

Labels:

8 Comments:

Anonymous Chris said...

I couldn't care less which way you lean - I'm a lot more conservative than most of "them" like, but whatever.

The reason I didn't comment is because I couldn't make sense of the post.

10/03/2006 6:57 PM  
Blogger murph112 said...

I don't comment with your political posts because I almost always disagree with you, and I don't want to be rude. It is your blog after all.

10/03/2006 7:21 PM  
Anonymous MiKell said...

Sorry, chris, but if you couldn't make sense of the post(s), you didn't follow the links.

murch112: it is perfectly okay to disagree, that is how conversations begin. If I didn't comment on every blog post (at other blogs) I disagree with, I might not ever comment.

Hell, I could be completely wrong in that last thought. Maybe that's what the posters WISH would happen.

10/03/2006 7:43 PM  
Anonymous Chris said...

You're right; when someone has links to links inside links in links in pages in links with little explaination of what they're talking about, then no, I don't follow them.

Just sayin'

10/03/2006 8:59 PM  
Blogger MiKell said...

I'm okay with that, chris. I'd suggest picking up a paper, watching the news, following the links, or continue not commenting.

Just sayin'

10/03/2006 9:04 PM  
Blogger murph112 said...

In that case, when you take on the responsibility to make decisions for the public, you loose the right to make these kind of bad decisions for yourself. I am not saying that it doesn't happen (all the time) but for christ's sake lay off the teenagers. I can think of few things less reprehensible than sexual overtures towards children. One final thought, if he gave up too easily and without a fight, what else (and worse) must he be hiding?

10/04/2006 9:22 AM  
Anonymous Chris said...

Hehe, yep. That's why I didn't comment in the first place, goober, until you said nobody did.

In fact I read a great deal of news, but without following all your links, I didn't know to what exactly you were referring to, so just didn't say anything.

I mean, I don't ONLY read you for the porn. :)

See? I even read back to see if you respond to old comments!

(PS beta blogger still sucks for the rest of us trying to leave you comments.)

word ver: zzqqhssam

10/04/2006 3:30 PM  
Anonymous MiKell said...

Chris: you - kill - me.

Murph: Please. He is not a "child". He was a paige at 16, the perported "emails" were after his tenure (read:17) and once again, there was NO TOUCHING!!

It is still "icky" and he should have resigned.

And making bad decisions is the American way. You never lose that right.

My word ver: vualckb

10/04/2006 10:32 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home